Founded by Max Farndale 1947 - 2018
The Government's 2017 Budget will be delivered on Thursday 25 May, and will be centred on providing opportunities for all Kiwis to get ahead, Finance Minister Steven Joyce says.
"The 2017 Budget will build on the strengthening performance of the New Zealand economy over the last several years. It will focus on creating the conditions for further growth and greater prosperity for all New Zealanders," Mr Joyce says.
"New Zealand businesses have generated 328,000 new jobs since 2008, and average weekly wages have grown by 26.1 per cent – more than double the rate of inflation. Budget 2017 will seek to give businesses the confidence to keep investing and keep growing, to provide more opportunities for New Zealand families.”
A key element of the Budget will involve investing in the public services and building the infrastructure for a growing New Zealand.
"As the economy grows, we have a little more headroom to invest in better public services. However, as always, our focus will be on achieving better results, and not just tipping in more taxpayers money," Mr Joyce says.
“It is also very important to remain mindful that the money the Government spends comes from hard working Kiwi families. We remain committed to reducing the tax burden on lower and middle income earners when we have the room to do so.”
Mr Joyce says the Budget will continue a relentless focus on reducing debt as a percentage of GDP.
"A key part of building a resilient economy is creating the necessary buffers to deal with the next economic shock. The Government remains committed to its target of reducing net debt to 20 per cent of GDP by 2020/21," Mr Joyce says.
| A Beehive release | February 08, 2017 ||
The New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union says the $23 million windfall return to internet billionaire Peter Thiel in a corporate welfare sweetheart deal with the Government-owned New Zealand Venture Investment Fund shows why the Government’s programmes of corporate welfare should be shut down as part of this year’s budget.
Jordan Williams, the Executive Director of the Taxpayers’ Union, says:
“This is exactly what we have been accusing the Government of, and Steven Joyce has been denying, for many years. If corporate welfare deals go sour most of the costs land on taxpayers. This most recent example shows that even when ventures do well, most proceeds go to the private party. No wonder people label it ‘crony capitalism’.”
“Our most recent report on corporate welfare shows that the current Government is spending more than ever on these sorts of deals and subsidies. It was $1.36 billion in last year’s budget alone. If that money was used to lower company taxes, the 28% rate could be reduced to 22%. That would mean a boost to all Kiwi businesses, and not just those cherry-picked by the likes of NZVIF and Callaghan Innovation.”
“Politicians and bureaucrats in Wellington need to stop trying to outsmart people like Peter Thiel with our money. They’re on a hiding to nothing and this deal shows why.”
“Criticism of Mr Thiel for accepting corporate welfare misses the point – what businessman would turn down free money? The responsibility lies squarely with the National and Labour Parties which set up these corporate welfare schemes. Peter Beck, probably New Zealand’s largest corporate welfare recipient through his “Rocket Lab” venture, is even a nominee for the NZ Herald’s New Zealander of the Year. Rocket Lab is another taxpayer funded venture competing with Silicon Valley billionaires.”
Jim Rose’s report for the Taxpayers' Union on corporate welfare, Welfare Bums: Adding Up the Cost of Corporate Welfare in the 2016 Budget is available at http://www.taxpayers.org.nz/welfare_bums
| An NZTaxpayers' Union release | February 8, 2017 ||
Exporters Must Persuade Government to Start Backtracking.
Russia’s ban on importing New Zealand beef on the grounds of discovering additives in it has in fact all the characteristics of a reprisal for participating in the United States-invoked embargo.
New Zealand is viewed as an easy target as the Russians now start retaliating against those nations which supported the blockade.
The embargo mainly involved the United States and the EU. But anxious to appease the United States New Zealand deliberately demonstrated “solidarity” with the US, in the words of former premier John Key.
In return for this New Zealand took pole position in the now defunct Trans Pacific Partnership Treaty and as a special reward Auckland was chosen as the venue for participants to sign it.
There are indications that Russia will use several hygiene scares in recent years to choke off supplies of New Zealand dairy products.
At one time Russia was considered as New Zealand’s prime emerging market. But since the 1980s Russia has been supplanted by Asia.
It is here though that the US embargo on Russia did its most serious damage to New Zealand trade.
This occurred when France was prevented from sending its milk to Russia, along with milk exports from several other EU nations.
The result was the EU milk surplus now found its way to China, severely depressing demand for New Zealand milk.
New Zealand’s position in the US-led blockade of Russia will remain a problem for some years to come even though the embargo itself has now become moot under President Donald Trump.
Commodity exporters are trying to cool the ardour of New Zealand legislators in the matter of supporting the embargo.
This will allow them to mend fences with the Russians.
One advantage here will be the resignation at the end of last year of New Zealand premier John Key, known to be an ardent supporter of former United States president Barack Obama.
The public and indeed New Zealand’s legislators in the matter of the long-running embargo have something in common in that they have both been unaware of the consequences of participating in the blockade.
In France, in contrast, the consequences are well understood. Russia’s president Putin (pictured) deliberately called up well-publicised bulldozings of French produce found to have entered Russia via bills of ladings sourced in its old African colonies.
France, under pressure from the United States, was forced to abandon its showpiece advanced technology export which was its Mistral Class vessel for Russia’s navy.
Combined with the loss of its Russia disposal market for milk products the embargo is one of the factors behind the elimination of France’s ruling Socialist Party from any contention in this year’s presidential election.
| From the This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | Wednesday 8 February 2017 ||
A by-election to elect a new Member of Parliament for the general electorate of Mt Albert will be held in New Zealand on Saturday 25 February 2017.
Science and Innovation Minister Paul Goldsmith has today announced the reappointment of Claire Robinson, Brett Hewlett, and Suse Reynolds to the Callaghan Innovation Stakeholder Advisory Group.
“The reappointment of Ms Robinson, Mr Hewlett, and Ms Reynolds recognises the valuable skills and insights they all contribute to the advisory group, as well as their work to ensure that Callaghan is connected and engaged with its stakeholders,” says Mr Goldsmith.
Callaghan Innovation is the government agency tasked with growing New Zealand’s economy by helping business succeed through technology.
The seven-member Stakeholder Advisory Group provides independent, expert advice to the Callaghan Innovation Board. It includes some of the most well-respected people involved in New Zealand innovation.
Professor Robinson, Mr Hewlett and Ms Reynolds have been reappointed for further two-year terms.
Ms Reynolds, founder and Board member of Angel HQ, has also been appointed as the chair of the Advisory Group.
“Suse’s extensive networks and in-depth experience with New Zealand’s angel investment community stand her in strong stead to lead the Advisory Group, and I welcome her appointment as Chair,” Mr Goldsmith says.
More information about the Advisory Group can be found on Callaghan Innovation’s website.
| A Beehive release | February 7, 2017 ||
Trade Minister Todd McClay will visit Japan and Singapore this week to discuss regional trade issues with his ministerial counterparts.
During his visit to Japan, which is the first stop, Mr McClay will meet with the Minister in charge of Economic Revitalization Nobuteru Ishihara.
“Japan is New Zealand’s fifth largest two-way trading partner, a significant source of foreign investment, and a key international partner in our efforts to liberalise trade in the Asia-Pacific region,” Minister McClay says.
“We need to sit down and discuss the future of trade between our two countries and how we can best support regional economic integration and trade liberalisation.”
In Singapore, Mr McClay will meet with Minister for Trade and Industry Lim Hng Kiang.
“Given both Japan and Singapore are Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) signatories, I will take the opportunity to exchange views on the United States’ recent withdrawal from its TPP ratification process.
Minister McClay will also visit Mexico for trade discussions next week.
| A Beehive release | January 6, 2017 ||
Good afternoon,
My thanks to the Rotary Club of Auckland, and in particular President Andrew Aitken and the Rotary team for hosting this event.
I also want to acknowledge Deputy Prime Minister Paula Bennett and Finance Minister Steven Joyce, who are here today. Both of them are doing great work on behalf of New Zealanders.
Special guests, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for coming today.
The start of the year is the time to stand back and look at how we’re doing as a country.
New Zealand is a fantastic place to live, work and raise a family.
We aren’t the only ones who think so.
There are around 200 countries in the world.
Of those, New Zealand is currently ranked first for overall prosperity, first for personal freedom and civil rights, first for ease of doing business, first equal for anti-corruption and second for quality of government. And we want to make that first.
That’s a pretty good record.
We’re a respected participant in international affairs.
A few weeks ago, I returned from meeting leaders of the European Union, Germany and the UK.
I wanted to lock in agreement with the EU to proceed with a free trade agreement and get a commitment from the UK to negotiate an FTA when the time is appropriate.
I’m pleased to say we received a positive hearing on both of those issues.
But these talks look pretty straightforward compared to the complexities and tensions building up in world politics – a newly assertive Russia and China, the ongoing refugee pressures around the Mediterranean, Brexit, a new US President and rising nationalism.
All the political leaders I met were focused on these developments, because their long-held assumptions about how the world works are being tested.
Some people believe New Zealand’s location protects us from the most immediate pressures.
But in time, the effects of decisions made in Washington, Berlin, Moscow and London will wash up on our shores.
When our values and direction are tested, we should remember that history shows we’ve developed a successful recipe for New Zealand over many years, and we can hold true to our values.
That allows us to face international challenges with confidence. Confidence in our resilience, confidence in our ability to adapt and confidence in our place in the world.
We have forged a distinctive place in the global community as a fair minded people with a successful economy open to trade, investment and migration.
That economic success has been hard won by New Zealanders.
It should not be taken for granted.
As some of you know, I was brought up in Southland, a place where hard work and farm skills were respected more than profit, and where no one could do it all on their own.
I got my politics around our large dining table growing up, and from my mother who ran a farm, raised 12 children and was a serial community activist.
By the early 1980s, I was a new, keen and highly indebted young farmer. Interest rates were around 17 per cent, but farm costs were held down by wage and price freezes.
That wasn’t sustainable and just papered over the economic problems that had built up over a number of years.
The economy had to be restructured. My community was hit hard as farm subsidies were wiped.
I made lots of financial and farm management mistakes. But with the help of family and a lot of hard work, we stayed on our feet.
Many New Zealand families had similar experiences in other industries, as jobs were lost and they struggled to rethink where they fitted in a country that had suddenly changed.
We thought the world owed us a living. It didn’t.
I learned then that business and families in a small trading country like ours needs to continuously adapt in small steps – and that government should back Kiwis to do just that, focusing on resilience and aspiration rather than fear and isolation.
Hiding from economic reality eventually requires drastic and damaging change.
This has been the guiding philosophy behind the National-led Government’s approach over the past eight years. And it has delivered the strong economy we have now.
As a new MP in 1990, I saw the deep-seated resilience of our rural families and communities as they rebuilt their skills and their confidence.
I saw the same qualities in the big city when I married into a Samoan Italian family.
I must admit the scruffy unemployed farm worker who turned up on the arm of their eldest daughter wasn’t quite what Mary’s parents had in mind as a son-in-law – busy as they were with several jobs and raising a large family.
From them I saw the grit and determination it takes to feed and educate a large family, own a home and win respect when starting afresh in a new country.
Mary and I have raised six children of our own.
Along with the hundreds of families we’ve met through school, church, relatives and dozens of sports teams, we’ve shared the experience of working multiple jobs, getting everyone everywhere on time, finding time to spend with the children and each other – and for enough sleep – as well as answering the hardest question of all every day: what’s for dinner and who is cooking it?
The people who shaped my life are resilient and capable.
I’m proud that on the other side of the globe from the European capitals I visited a few weeks ago, New Zealanders have built a cohesive and globally competitive country that can provide valuable lessons to the rest of the world.
In recent years, New Zealand has dealt with the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression, we’ve dealt with devastating earthquakes and we’ve made significant progress on deep-seated social and Treaty issues.
We now have a dynamic and diversified export sector, sound government finances, low unemployment and thousands of new jobs.
People are voting with their feet. New Zealanders are staying home, more tourists want to visit us, and more people want to live here.
The outlook remains positive and the economy continues to grow with over 130,000 jobs created in the last year. Average wages are expected to keep rising and reach $66,000 a year by 2021.
That means more opportunities for our kids to get jobs and more money in people’s pockets.
The global economy is looking a bit better than last year, with improving prospects in Europe and the US. However, the political instability I mentioned earlier means there is no room for complacency.
In this environment, I believe the biggest threat to New Zealand is disruption of the international system of open trade.
Under my leadership, New Zealand will continue to advocate for free trade and aim to execute high quality trade agreements.
When we open doors for our exporters, they walk through and create opportunities and jobs for New Zealanders.
Our immediate challenges at home are what I call the positive challenges of growth.
The Government is building the roads, schools and houses needed to support our growing communities.
We’re providing the public services and infrastructure needed by a successful, growing and modern economy – and there’s much more to do.
The whole point of building a strong economy is to improve the lives of all New Zealanders.
If we can stay on course and build on the progress we’ve already made, we have the best opportunity in decades to make positive sustainable choices for our country - choices that deliver better incomes for our families, safer communities, and provide better government services for everyone.
As Prime Minister, I want people to be rewarded for their hard work and enterprise.
Businesses, farms and entrepreneurs across New Zealand are the engines of growth in our country – as are the people who work hard every day in those enterprises.
So we’ll continue to back people who take risks to create new jobs and new businesses.
We’ll back hard-working people who get up early in the morning to milk the cows or to catch the bus to work, so they can raise their families.
And we’ll back people who bravely leave behind welfare dependency to move into work or who work hard to manage their health issues or disability so they can live independently.
I believe in the capacity of all New Zealanders to improve their lives in some way, large or small. And I believe in the generosity of this country to help them do it.
Here’s what I mean.
Last year, I visited Kaiti School in Gisborne, where many of the children come from low-income families.
I saw inspired teachers sign up parents, mostly young mums, to the local iwi savings scheme.
I met a five year-old who presented me with a business plan for selling toffee apples at the school fair. He told me about his products, his customers and his marketing.
If we accept the normal assumptions, then that young Māori boy hasn’t got much chance. But what I saw in his eyes, and in the teachers supporting him, will change his life.
Through my extensive family and many years as a local MP, I have seen hundreds of examples of suffering and loss of hope turned around by quiet heroism in our communities, families, schools and public services.
It never happens without the hope of one person for another.
I’ve also seen lives blighted by poor public services, bad decisions, neglect and bureaucratic inertia.
A well-intentioned public service on its own is no guarantee of success – we have to help people to fan the small flames of hope.
This Government is committed to doing that.
We’ve developed a better understanding of the needs of people who rely on us most.
Public servants can now see the lifelong benefits of intervening early to help those in need, and the lifelong costs when that doesn’t happen.
We know, for example, that a teen parent on welfare will spend an average of 17 years on a benefit, at a cost of just under $300,000.
There is a group of around 1000 five year-olds each year who, in later life, are far more likely to commit crime, be on a benefit or go to jail, and they’re far less likely to succeed at school.
Left alone, each of these children will cost taxpayers on average around $270,000 over the next 30 years, with some costing over $1 million.
We will spend time and money now to change the course of their lives.
For too long, governments have serviced misery, rather than investing upfront to help people change their lives for the better.
Some New Zealanders need ongoing support to help them lead a decent life – and they should have as much choice as possible in how that happens.
But there are many more who will benefit from smart, lighter-handed assistance and will then move on.
It seems pretty basic to me that if you are spending billions of dollars on social programmes like health, education, welfare, housing and law and order then it should work.
You should actually be achieving something, otherwise you’re wasting taxpayers’ money and messing with people’s lives.
So we now publish results every six months showing what has been accomplished.
Spending more public money is not, in itself, an achievement.
Real achievement is reducing welfare dependency.
Real achievement is getting better results for our kids at school.
And real achievement is preventing rheumatic fever, and reducing emergency department waiting times.
Real achievement is changing lives.
This approach, which we call Social Investment, is showing promising results.
There are now over 50,000 fewer children living in benefit-dependent households than there were in 2011.
And the number of sole parents on a benefit is the lowest since 1988.
My Government is willing to take the risk of trying new ways to help those most in need.
Some new services might not work. Others might be opposed by existing providers.
In election year, some will say the answer is always more money. If that were true, we would have no social problems, as we’ve been increasing funding for decades.
The recent rise in the prison population confirms we need to do better.
We’ve made some progress in breaking the cycle of welfare dependency, child abuse, low education levels and escalating criminal offending, a cycle that is often inter-generational. It is a long job.
But there remains a small number of people who have a disproportionate impact on the safety of our communities.
Too many people in prison and on community sentences are regulars in the government system.
So today I want to address that issue.
This Government’s Policing Excellence and Prevention First programmes have focused on reducing crime and preventing reoffending.
These programmes contributed to a 20 per cent reduction in crime between 2009 and 2014. They improved public confidence in Police, and they drove productivity gains that freed up the equivalent of more than 350 extra frontline officers.
More recently, we’ve set challenging targets to reduce violent crime, youth crime and reoffending.
We’ve made it harder for violent offenders to get bail and we’ve sharpened our focus on preventing family violence.
And we’re using Social Investment to better understand the people who most need our intervention and identify what really helps them to lead better lives.
We have driven government agencies to address the drivers of dysfunction, rather than just responding to the symptoms.
Because preventing crime often requires intervention from education or housing agencies rather than just the Police, for example.
Here is a surprising fact: The most common age of an apprehended burglar last year was 16. That’s right - just 16-years-old.
We need to push harder to keep every young person on a track that avoids first offending and prevents them moving on to even more serious crime.
But the Police frontline need more time to dedicate additional resources to crime prevention and working with other agencies, while also meeting higher demand for dealing with serious crime now.
Although recorded crime has fallen since 2009, overall demand for Police services has recently increased.
That’s down to the complexity and time-consuming nature of cases such as family violence, child abuse and sexual assault, as reporting of these crimes increases.
In addition, recorded crime has begun to rise again over the last two years - particularly burglaries, robberies and assaults.
As I’ve said, this Government is prepared to invest up front in programmes that will tackle these complex issues and make a positive difference to communities.
We are committed to delivering better public services for a growing country.
So today I’m announcing a $503 million investment in Police and the wider justice sector to reduce crime and keep our communities safe.
This Safer Communities package has three parts:
First, targeting and catching offenders.
Second, preventing crime and reducing victimisation.
And third, delivering a more responsive Police service.
This significant taxpayer investment comes with a range of challenging performance targets for Police.
They include higher attendance at home burglaries, seizing more assets from organised crime, reducing deaths from family violence and reducing reoffending by Māori.
Meeting these targets won’t be easy. But we’re not here to shy away from the hard issues.
Safer Communities provides funding for over 1100 additional Police staff, of whom 880 will be sworn officers. This will increase the number of sworn officers to nearly 9800 by June 2021, and the number of non-sworn staff to over 3200.
That’s a 10 per cent increase in the size of the police force over the next four years.
The package includes:
All police districts will receive extra officers, with Police deciding how many will go where, based on need.
We are unashamedly targeting offenders to ensure they are off our streets - by providing additional resources for Police to resolve more crime, and target criminal gangs and organised crime.
We’re also providing additional resources to address the underlying drivers of crime – through preventative work by the Police and greater investment in rehabilitation for prisoners.
This large investment is possible only because of New Zealanders’ hard work to build a strong economy, backed by the Government’s plan to create economic opportunities and get our books back in order.
While the increase in police numbers is important, what really matters is ensuring it delivers better results for the community.
It’s about doing things smarter.
Here’s what I mean. Last year I visited Palmerston North and was told about a family that Police had visited 87 times for family violence callouts in the previous year.
Eighty-seven!
So rather than continue to visit the house every couple of days, social service agencies, working with Police, got together and identified one aunty the father would listen to. They worked with her to support the family.
The following year those 87 callouts dropped to only one.
That’s what I mean about doing things smarter.
Delivering better public services for a growing country is all about investing where it’s needed, while working smarter and being more accountable for results.
In weighing up promises by political parties this year, I challenge you to look beyond the dollar-figure soundbites.
I want you to ask whether the policy sets out exactly how it will improve people’s lives – or whether it is just taking the easy option of throwing money at a problem.
The Government has been working on this Safer Communities package for several months now. I want to acknowledge the work and strong advocacy of former Police Minister Judith Collins, as well as that of the new Minister Paula Bennett.
Ladies and gentlemen.
On September 23, I will ask New Zealanders for the privilege of leading our country for the next three years. I’m excited by that prospect.
National will go into the election with a positive and ambitious programme that will back New Zealanders to succeed.
Over the coming months, I look forward to setting out the next steps in that plan.
Thank you.
Bill EnglishPrime Minister
Prime Minister Bill English has announced this year’s General Election will be held on Saturday, 23 September.
“As we have done in previous election years I am announcing the election date early as I believe it’s important to provide the country with some certainty and that it’s in everyone’s best interest to have plenty of notice.”
National will be campaigning on its strong record in Government and will go into the election with a positive and ambitious programme that will back New Zealanders to succeed.
“I am proud of what we are achieving for New Zealanders,” says Mr English.
“Our economy continues to grow and diversify, more kids are staying at school longer and getting better qualifications, more people are getting faster and more efficient healthcare, we are investing at record levels in key infrastructure projects like schools, roads and ultra-fast broadband and we are supporting our most vulnerable by increasing benefit rates and investing in programmes to support them into work.
“New Zealand is well placed compared to many other countries. That’s down to the hard work of households and businesses across the country, backed by the National-led Government’s clear and successful plan for our future.
“The challenge for our country now is to sustain that growth and build on it to deliver more again for all New Zealanders.”
Mr English has contacted the Governor-General to advise her of the election date.
The Government’s intention is that the House will rise on Thursday, 17 August and Parliament will be dissolved on 22 August.
Writ day will follow on 23 August, and nominations will close at noon on 29 August. The last day for the return of the writ will be 12 October.
| A Beehive release | February 1, 2017 ||
Under fire for misguided hand-outs, government dithered instead of issuing instant public health warning
When Muhammad Ali visited New Zealand even boxing aficionados failed to recognise his traveling companion Jimmy Ellis (pictured) the former champ. Ellis shrunken in size and bent over we know now was then in the grip of dementia pugilistica.
Muhammad Ali was shortly afterward himself to start succumbing to the effects of his pugilistic career.
The willingness at the end of last year for government cabinet members even to entertain the notion of public funds being devoted to a professional boxing spectacle in Auckland implicitly supported the promoters.
It gave tacit encouragement to an activity dedicated to causing human injury and so also creating an unnecessary drain on public health funds.
It was announced that the Joseph Parker heavyweight boxing match was “borderline” for government funding according to economic development minister Steven Joyce ..
The National Government is under constant assault from the well-funded whistle-blower Taxpayers Union for unnecessary or frivolous spending.
Boxing spectacles obviously fall into this category. This should have been stated at the outset.
Boxing is the only permitted activity in which one participant deliberately seeks to inflict injury upon the other.
Frank Bruno another former champ and suffering from the effects of repeated blows to his head has had this said of himself:-
“Bruno was known for his excellent punching power: he won 40 of his 45 bouts and 38 by knockout, giving him a 95% knockout rate from the fights he won; his overall knockout percentage is 84.44%.”
These “knockouts” amount to an impact paralysis and seizure of the brain, the body’s most delicate component, and which in a free state cannot support its own weight.
The failure of the government to swiftly state that no public funds under any circumstances would be devoted to this activity only added to an increasing suspicion that the government is unable to say no to anyone on anything at all.
A government events panel assessed the boxing spectacle donation.
This involved a group of ministers, including Mr Joyce, sports minister Dr Jonathan Coleman and arts minister Maggie Barry.
Jonathan Coleman is a medical doctor.
The promoters had said they needed a decision in a few weeks. Normally the Government would take a couple of months to assess an application, but it had moved more quickly in a couple of cases, Mr Joyce obligingly indicated.
With its immense public relations apparatus at its disposal none of these appears to have weighed up the pros and cons of some supporting materials for the benefit of the public at large.
A background communique could have said for example that the American Association of Neurological Surgeons claims that 90 percent of boxers suffer some kind of brain injury while boxing.
Because of these brain injuries, the surgeons claim, boxers are more prone to mental deterioration during their later years that can lead to Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s.
This was an opportunity for the government to issue a cigarette packet style of warning
Instead the burden of the government’s argument against dedicating public money to the boxing spectacle was that it was a private enterprise corporate promotion and therefore run for profit and therefore did not qualify for a hand-out.
Petrified into silence for fear of being seen as remotely anti sport, the mainstream media stood aside from deliberations.
The episode again starkly reveals the need for a samizdat boom-lowering voice such as that of the Taxpayers’ Union, an organisation whose disclosures consistently stand up, unrefuted.
| From the This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. | Thursday 2 February 2017 ||
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has appointed University of Auckland’s Deputy Dean of Engineering, Margaret Hyland as its new Chief Scientist.
"We are delighted to announce Margaret’s appointment as Chief Scientist. This crucial leadership role will be important as we implement the National Statement of Science Investment, and will contribute to the deepening relationships between the Ministry and the science community," says Paul Stocks, Deputy Chief Executive Labour, Science and Enterprise.
Margaret, who is Professor of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Auckland, holds a PhD from the University of Western Ontario in Canada and has spent her career specialising in aluminium technology, and the chemistry and engineering of material surfaces. She is a Fellow of the Institute of Chemical Engineering and, in addition to her numerous teaching awards, she was the first woman to be awarded the prestigious Pickering Medal for excellence in technology by the Royal Society of New Zealand in 2015. Margaret was previously the Director of the Science for Technological Innovation National Science Challenge.
"As Chief Scientist, Margaret will provide science leadership, and work with teams providing advice on science systems, policy and investment. She will be tasked with building on the existing strategic direction of the science system, with a particular eye on the capability of the sector and opportunities going forward. She will also play a crucial role in ensuring that the sector’s expertise and intelligence are captured and communicated during the development of policy and investment plans," Paul says.
Margaret will be seconded to MBIE for 80% of her time for the next two years from February 1 2017.
| A Beehive release | January 27, 2017 ||
Palace of the Alhambra, Spain
By: Charles Nathaniel Worsley (1862-1923)
From the collection of Sir Heaton Rhodes
Oil on canvas - 118cm x 162cm
Valued $12,000 - $18,000
Offers invited over $9,000
Contact: Henry Newrick – (+64 ) 27 471 2242
Mount Egmont with Lake
By: John Philemon Backhouse (1845-1908)
Oil on Sea Shell - 13cm x 14cm
Valued $2,000-$3,000
Offers invited over $1,500
Contact: Henry Newrick – (+64 ) 27 471 2242
|
|